Application of eDNA metabarcoding in a fragmented lowland river: spatial and methodological comparison of fish species composition

Antognazza, Caterina M.; Britton, Robert J.; Read, Daniel S. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8546-5154; Goodall, Tim ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1526-4071; Mantzouratou, Anna; De Santis, Vanessa; Davies, Peter; Aprahamian, Miran; Franklin, Elizabeth; Hardouin, Emilie A.; Andreou, Demetra. 2021 Application of eDNA metabarcoding in a fragmented lowland river: spatial and methodological comparison of fish species composition. Environmental DNA, 3 (2). 458-471. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.136

Before downloading, please read NORA policies.

Preview

Text N529269JA.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract/Summary

Assessments of fish communities tend to rely on capture‐based methods that, due to sampling biases, can underestimate actual species richness. Alternatively, environmental DNA (eDNA) based metabarcoding is a noncapture approach that infers species richness and distribution by collecting and sequencing DNA present in the ecosystem. Here, eDNA metabarcoding was applied to the lower River Severn, a highly modified and impounded river, to identify the species present in the fish assemblage. Using a universal primer for fish (12S mtDNA region), comparisons were made between the species identified as present by eDNA metabarcoding versus long‐term data available from fisheries monitoring data based on capture methods. Depending on the stringency of detection thresholds applied, the two methods detected between 15 and 25 fish species present in the river, with the eDNA metabarcoding detecting most species previously reported in the capture surveys, although with differences in the relative abundance of species between the methods. Notably, eDNA metabarcoding detected species of high conservation importance that were never sampled by capture techniques, including native European shads (Alosa spp.). Differences in the similarity indices of species detection were greater between the sampling methods than between sampling sites on each river. These results highlight the high potential of eDNA metabarcoding to provide an effective monitoring tool for biodiversity and conservation in rivers, but also indicate the need for complementary multi‐method sampling for robust estimates of fish species richness.

Item Type:	Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):	https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.136
UKCEH and CEH Sections/Science Areas:	Soils and Land Use (Science Area 2017-)
ISSN:	2637-4943
Additional Information. Not used in RCUK Gateway to Research.:	Open Access paper - full text available via Official URL link.
Additional Keywords:	eDNA, fish monitoring, habit fragmentation, lotic system, metabarcoding, river
NORA Subject Terms:	Ecology and Environment
Date made live:	24 Dec 2020 13:34 +0 (UTC)
URI:	https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/529269

Actions (login required)

View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...