Quantification of bedform dynamics and bedload sediment flux in sandy braided rivers from airborne and satellite imagery

Strick, Robert J.P. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0483-5593; Ashworth, Philip J. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9642-4857; Sambrook Smith, Gregory H. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3707-1182; Nicholas, Andrew P. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8713-8656; Best, James L.; Lane, Stuart N. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6077-6076; Parsons, Daniel R. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5142-4466; Simpson, Christopher J.; Unsworth, Christopher A. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8387-420X; Dale, Jonathan ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5242-8071. 2019 Quantification of bedform dynamics and bedload sediment flux in sandy braided rivers from airborne and satellite imagery. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 44 (4). 953-972. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4558

Before downloading, please read NORA policies.

Preview

Text
esp.4558.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.
Download (4MB) | Preview

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/esp.4558

Abstract/Summary

Images from specially‐commissioned aeroplane sorties (manned aerial vehicle, MAV), repeat unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) surveys, and Planet CubeSat satellites are used to quantify dune and bar dynamics in the sandy braided South Saskatchewan River, Canada. Structure‐from‐Motion (SfM) techniques and application of a depth‐brightness model are used to produce a series of Digital Surface Models (DSMs) at low and near‐bankfull flows. A number of technical and image processing challenges are described that arise from the application of SfM in dry and submerged environments. A model for best practice is presented and analysis suggests a depth‐brightness model approach can represent the different scales of bedforms present in sandy braided rivers with low‐turbidity and shallow (< 2 m deep) water. The aerial imagery is used to quantify the spatial distribution of unit bar and dune migration rate in an 18 km reach and three ~1 km long reaches respectively. Dune and unit bar migration rates are highly variable in response to local variations in planform morphology. Sediment transport rates for dunes and unit bars, obtained by integrating migration rates (from UAV) with the volume of sediment moved (from DSMs using MAV imagery) show near‐equivalence in sediment flux. Hence, reach‐based sediment transport rate estimates can be derived from unit bar data alone. Moreover, it is shown that reasonable estimates of sediment transport rate can be made using just unit bar migration rates as measured from 2D imagery, including from satellite images, so long as informed assumptions are made regarding average bar shape and height. With recent availability of frequent, repeat satellite imagery, and the ease of undertaking repeat MAV and UAV surveys, for the first time, it may be possible to provide global estimates of bedload sediment flux for large or inaccessible low‐turbidity rivers that currently have sparse information on bedload sediment transport rates.

Item Type:	Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):	https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4558
ISSN:	01979337
NORA Subject Terms:	Earth Sciences
Date made live:	13 May 2020 15:01 +0 (UTC)
URI:	https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/527372

Item Type:

Publication - Article

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4558

ISSN:

01979337

NORA Subject Terms:

Earth Sciences

Date made live:

13 May 2020 15:01 +0 (UTC)

URI:

https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/527372