An assessment of the performance of the PLUS+ tool in supporting the evaluation of Water Framework Directive compliance in Scottish standing waters

Donnelly, David; Helliwell, Rachel C.; May, Linda ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3385-9973; McCreadie, Brian. 2020 An assessment of the performance of the PLUS+ tool in supporting the evaluation of Water Framework Directive compliance in Scottish standing waters [in special issue: Diffuse water pollution modeling, monitoring and mitigation] International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17 (2), 391. 24, pp. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020391

Before downloading, please read NORA policies.

Preview

Text N526888JA.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Download (3MB) | Preview

Abstract/Summary

Phosphorus is one of the main causes of waterbodies in Scotland being at less than good ecological status (GES) in terms of the water framework directive (WFD). In Scotland, there are more than 8000 standing waters, defined as lakes and reservoirs that have a surface area of more than 1 hectare. Only about 330 of these are monitored routinely to assess compliance with the WFD. The export coefficient tool PLUS+ (phosphorus land use and slope) has been developed to estimate total phosphorus (TP) concentrations in the unmonitored sites; modelled values are then compared to WFD target concentrations for high, good, moderate, poor, and bad status to assess compliance. These type-specific or site-specific targets are set by the regulatory authority and form part of a suite of physical, chemical, and ecological targets that are used to assess GES, all of which must be met. During development, the PLUS+ tool was applied to 323 monitored catchments and 7471 unmonitored catchments. The efficacy of the tool was assessed against TP concentrations observed in 2014 and found to perform well in the rural catchments. 51% of standing waters had the same modelled and observed WFD class (i.e., High, Good, Moderate, Poor, Bad), and a further 40% of standing waters had a modelled WFD class that was within one class of observed water quality. The tool performed less well in catchments with larger inputs of TP from urban sources (e.g., sewage). The greatest deviations between measured and modelled classes were explained by the shortage of information on wastewater treatment works, fish farms, migratory birds, levels of uncertainty in TP measurements, and the amount of in-lake re-cycling of P. The limitations of the tool are assessed using data from six well documented case study sites and recommendations for improving the model performance are proposed

Item Type:	Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):	https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020391
UKCEH and CEH Sections/Science Areas:	Water Resources (Science Area 2017-)
ISSN:	1660-4601
Additional Information. Not used in RCUK Gateway to Research.:	Open Access paper - full text available via Official URL link.
Additional Keywords:	total phosphorus, lakes, reservoirs
NORA Subject Terms:	Ecology and Environment
Date made live:	14 Feb 2020 16:15 +0 (UTC)
URI:	https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/526888

Actions (login required)

View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...