nerc.ac.uk

Using remote sensing to detect whale strandings in remote areas: the case of sei whales mass mortality in Chilean Patagonia

Fretwell, Peter T. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1988-5844; Jackson, Jennifer A. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4158-1924; Ulloa Encina, Mauricio J.; Häussermann, Vreni; Perez Alvarez, Maria J.; Olavarría, Carlos; Gutstein, Carolina S.. 2019 Using remote sensing to detect whale strandings in remote areas: the case of sei whales mass mortality in Chilean Patagonia. PLoS ONE, 14 (10), e0222498. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222498

Before downloading, please read NORA policies.
[img]
Preview
Text (Open Access)
© 2019 Fretwell et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
journal.pone.0222498.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (4MB) | Preview

Abstract/Summary

We test the ability of Very High Resolution satellite (VHR) imagery to detect stranded whales using both manual and automated methods. We use the 2015 mass mortality event in the Gulf of Penas locality, central Patagonia, Chile, as an initial case study. This event was the largest known mass mortality of baleen whales, with at least 343 whales, mainly sei whales (Balaenoptera borealis), documented as stranding. However, even with such a large number of whales, due to the remote location of the gulf the strandings went unrecorded for several weeks. Aerial and boat surveys of the area were conducted two to four months after the mortality event. In this study we use 50cm resolution WorldView2 imagery to identify and count strandings from two archival images acquired just after the stranding event and two months before the aerial and ground surveys, and to test manual and automated methods of detecting stranded whales. Our findings show that whales are easily detected manually in the images but due to the heterogeneous colouration of decomposing whales, spectral indices are unsuitable for automatic detection. Our satellite counts suggest that, at the time the satellite images were taken, more whales were stranded than recorded in the aerial survey, possibly due to the non-comprehensive coverage of the aerial survey or movement of the carcases between survey acquisition. With even higher resolution imagery now available, satellite imagery may be a cost effective alternative to aerial surveys for future assessment of the extent of mass whale stranding events, especially in remote and inaccessible areas.

Item Type: Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222498
ISSN: 19326203
Additional Keywords: whales, remote survey, remote sensing, cetaceans, marine mammals, mass-stranding, population monitoring, satellite survey
Date made live: 18 Oct 2019 04:03 +0 (UTC)
URI: http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/525486

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

Downloads for past 30 days

Downloads per month over past year

More statistics for this item...