Reference points for predators will progress ecosystem-based management of fisheries

Hill, Simeon L. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1441-8769; Hinke, Jefferson; Bertrand, Sophie; Fritz, Lowell; Furness, Robert W.; Ianelli, James N.; Murphy, Matthew; Oliveros-Ramos, Ricardo; Pichegru, Lorien; Sharp, Rowland; Stillman, Richard A.; Wright, Peter J.; Ratcliffe, Norman ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3375-2431. 2020 Reference points for predators will progress ecosystem-based management of fisheries. Fish and Fisheries, 21 (2). 368-378. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12434

Before downloading, please read NORA policies.

Preview

Text (Open Access)
© 2020 The Authors. Fish and Fisheries published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Hill_et_al-2020-Fish_and_Fisheries.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.
Download (685kB) | Preview

Official URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/f...

Abstract/Summary

Ecosystem‐based management of fisheries aims to allow sustainable use of fished stocks while keeping impacts upon ecosystems within safe ecological limits. Both the FAO Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries and the Aichi Biodiversity Targets promote these aims. We evaluate implementation of ecosystem‐based management in six case‐study fisheries in which potential indirect impacts upon bird or mammal predators of fished stocks are well publicized and well studied. In particular, we consider the components needed to enable management strategies to respond to information from predator monitoring. Although such information is available in all case‐studies, only one has a reference point defining safe ecological limits for predators and none has a method to adjust fishing activities in response to estimates of the state of the predator population. Reference points for predators have been developed outside the fisheries management context, but adoption by fisheries managers is hindered a lack of clarity about management objectives and uncertainty about how fishing affects predator dynamics. This also hinders the development of adjustment methods because these generally require information on the state of ecosystem variables relative to reference points. Nonetheless, most of the case‐studies include precautionary measures to limit impacts on predators. These measures are not used tactically and therefore risk excessive restrictions on sustainable use. Adoption of predator reference points to inform tactical adjustment of precautionary measures would be an appropriate next step towards ecosystem‐based management.

Item Type:	Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):	https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12434
ISSN:	14672960
Additional Keywords:	Aichi Biodiversity Targets, adaptive management, ecosystem interactions, indirect impacts, management strategy, precautionary approach.
Date made live:	14 Jan 2020 15:42 +0 (UTC)
URI:	https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/524394

Item Type:

Publication - Article

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12434

ISSN:

14672960

Additional Keywords:

Aichi Biodiversity Targets, adaptive management, ecosystem interactions, indirect impacts, management strategy, precautionary approach.

Date made live:

14 Jan 2020 15:42 +0 (UTC)

URI:

https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/524394