SST Dynamics at Different Scales: Evaluating the Oceanographic Model Resolution Skill to Represent SST Processes in the Southern Ocean

Skákala, Jozef; Smyth, Tim J.; Torres, Ricardo; Buckingham, Christian E. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9355-9038; Brearley, Alexander ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3700-8017; Hyder, Pat; Coward, Andrew C. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9111-7700. 2019 SST Dynamics at Different Scales: Evaluating the Oceanographic Model Resolution Skill to Represent SST Processes in the Southern Ocean. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 124 (4). 2546-2570. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC014791

Before downloading, please read NORA policies.

Preview

Text (Open Access)
© 2019. The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Sk-kala_et_al-2019-Journal_of_Geophysical_Research__Oceans.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.
Download (3MB) | Preview

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2018JC014791

Abstract/Summary

In this study we demonstrate the many strengths of scale analysis: we use it to evaluate the Nucleus for European Modelling of the Ocean model skill in representing sea surface temperature (SST) in the Southern Ocean by comparing three model resolutions: 1/12°, 1/4°, and 1°. We show that while 4–5 times resolution scale is sufficient for each model resolution to reproduce the magnitude of satellite Earth Observation (EO) SST spatial variability to within ±10%, the representation of ∼100-km SST variability patterns is substantially (e.g., ∼50% at 750 km) improved by increasing model resolution from 1° to 1/12°. We also analyzed the dominant scales of the SST model input drivers (short-wave radiation, air-sea heat fluxes, wind stress components, wind stress curl, and bathymetry) variability with the purpose of determining the optimal SST model input driver resolution. The SST magnitude of variability is shown to scale with two power law regimes separated by a scaling break at ∼200-km scale. The analysis of the spatial and temporal scales of dominant SST driver impact helps to interpret this scaling break as a separation between two different dynamical regimes: the (relatively) fast SST dynamics below ∼200 km governed by eddies, fronts, Ekman upwelling, and air-sea heat exchange, while above ∼200 km the SST variability is dominated by long-term (seasonal and supraseasonal) modes and the SST geography.

Item Type:	Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):	https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC014791
ISSN:	2169-9275
Date made live:	23 Apr 2019 09:27 +0 (UTC)
URI:	https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/522977

Item Type:

Publication - Article

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC014791

ISSN:

2169-9275

Date made live:

23 Apr 2019 09:27 +0 (UTC)

URI:

https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/522977