Evaluating environmental risk assessment models for nanomaterials according to requirements along the product innovation Stage-Gate process

Sørensen, Sara Nørgaard; Baun, Anders; Burkard, Michael; Dal Maso, Miikka; Foss Hansen, Steffen; Harrison, Samuel ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8491-4720; Hjorth, Rune; Lofts, Stephen ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3627-851X; Matzke, Marianne; Nowack, Bernd; Peijnenburg, Willie; Poikkimäki, Mikko; Quik, Joris T.K.; Schirmer, Kristin; Verschoor, Anja; Wigger, Henning; Spurgeon, David J. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3264-8760. 2019 Evaluating environmental risk assessment models for nanomaterials according to requirements along the product innovation Stage-Gate process. Environmental Science: Nano, 6 (2). 505-518. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8EN00933C

Before downloading, please read NORA policies.

Preview

Text N522445PP.pdf - Accepted Version Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract/Summary

Nanomaterial risk governance requires models to estimate the material flow, fate and transport as well as uptake/bioavailability, hazard and risk in the environment. This study assesses the fit of such available models to different stages during the innovation of nano-enabled products. Through stakeholder consultations, criteria were identified for each innovation stage from idea conception to market launch and monitoring. In total, 38 models were scored against 41 criteria concerning model features, applicability, resource demands and outcome parameters. A scoring scheme was developed to determine how the models fit the criteria of each innovation stage. For each model, the individual criteria scores were added, yielding an overall fit score to each innovation stage. Three criteria were critical to stakeholders and incorporated as multipliers in the scoring scheme; the required time/costs and level of expertise needed to use the model, and for risk assessment models only, the option to compare PEC and PNEC. Regulatory compliance was also identified as critical, but could not be incorporated, as a nanomaterial risk assessment framework has yet to be developed and adopted by legislators. In conclusion, the scoring approach underlined similar scoring profiles across stages within model categories. As most models are research tools designed for use by experts, their score generally increased for later stages where most resources and expertise are committed. In contrast, stakeholders need relatively simple models to identify potential hazards and risk management measures at early product development stages to ensure safe use of nanomaterials without costs and resource needs hindering innovation.

Item Type:	Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):	https://doi.org/10.1039/C8EN00933C
UKCEH and CEH Sections/Science Areas:	Pollution (Science Area 2017-)
ISSN:	2051-8153
NORA Subject Terms:	Ecology and Environment
Date made live:	07 Mar 2019 12:21 +0 (UTC)
URI:	https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/522445

Actions (login required)

View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...