Evaluating combinations of temporally aggregated Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2 and Landsat 8 For land cover mapping with Google Earth Engine

Carrasco, Luis; O’Neil, Aneurin W. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3591-1034; Morton, R. Daniel; Rowland, Clare S. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0459-506X. 2019 Evaluating combinations of temporally aggregated Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2 and Landsat 8 For land cover mapping with Google Earth Engine. Remote Sensing, 11 (3), 288. 21, pp. 10.3390/rs11030288

Before downloading, please read NORA policies.

Preview

Text N522301JA.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Download (5MB) | Preview

Abstract/Summary

Land cover mapping of large areas is challenging due to the significant volume of satellite data to acquire and process, as well as the lack of spatial continuity due to cloud cover. Temporal aggregation—the use of metrics (i.e., mean or median) derived from satellite data over a period of time—is an approach that benefits from recent increases in the frequency of free satellite data acquisition and cloud-computing power. This enables the efficient use of multi-temporal data and the exploitation of cloud-gap filling techniques for land cover mapping. Here, we provide the first formal comparison of the accuracy between land cover maps created with temporal aggregation of Sentinel-1 (S1), Sentinel-2 (S2), and Landsat-8 (L8) data from one-year and test whether this method matches the accuracy of traditional approaches. hirty-two datasets were created for Wales by applying automated cloud-masking and temporally aggregating data over different time intervals, using Google Earth Engine. Manually processed S2 data was used for comparison using a traditional two-date composite approach. Supervised classifications were created, and their accuracy was assessed using field-based data. Temporal aggregation only matched the accuracy of the traditional two-date composite approach (77.9%) when an optimal combination of optical and radar data was used (76.5%). Combined datasets (S1, S2 or S1, S2, and L8) outperformed single-sensor datasets, while datasets based on spectral indices obtained the lowest levels of accuracy. The analysis of cloud cover showed that to ensure at least one cloud-free pixel per time interval, a maximum of two intervals per year for temporal aggregation were possible with L8, while three or four intervals could be used for S2. This study demonstrates that temporal aggregation is a promising tool for integrating large amounts of data in an efficient way and that it can compensate for the lower quality of automatic image selection and cloud masking. It also shows that combining data from different sensors can improve classification accuracy. However, this study highlights the need for identifying optimal combinations of satellite data and aggregation parameters in order to match the accuracy of manually selected and processed image composites.

Item Type:	Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):	10.3390/rs11030288
UKCEH and CEH Sections/Science Areas:	Soils and Land Use (Science Area 2017-)
ISSN:	2072-4292
Additional Information. Not used in RCUK Gateway to Research.:	Open Access paper - full text available via Official URL link.
Additional Keywords:	cloud computing, cloud masking, data fusion, gap filling, radar, supervised classifications
NORA Subject Terms:	Earth Sciences Ecology and Environment Space Sciences Data and Information
Date made live:	19 Feb 2019 11:22 +0 (UTC)
URI:	https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/522301

Actions (login required)

View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...