Long-term increase in secondary exposure to anticoagulant rodenticides in European polecats Mustela putorius in Great Britain

Sainsbury, Katherine A.; Shore, Richard F.; Schofield, Henry; Croose, Elizabeth; Pereira, M. Gloria ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3740-0019; Sleep, Darren ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1128-1883; Kitchener, Andrew C.; Hantke, Georg; McDonald, Robbie A.. 2018 Long-term increase in secondary exposure to anticoagulant rodenticides in European polecats Mustela putorius in Great Britain. Environmental Pollution, 236. 689-698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.02.004

Before downloading, please read NORA policies.

Preview

Text
N519519PP.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives 4.0.
Download (761kB) | Preview

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.02.004

Abstract/Summary

As a result of legal protection and population recovery, European polecats (Mustela putorius) in Great Britain are expanding into areas associated with greater usage of second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides (SGARs). We analysed polecat livers collected from road casualties from 2013 to 2016 for residues of five SGARs. We related variation in residues to polecat traits and potential exposure pathways, by analysing stable isotopes of carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (δ15N) in their whiskers. 54 of 68 (79%) polecats had detectable residues of at least one SGAR. Bromadiolone (71%) was the most frequently detected compound, followed by difenacoum (53%) and brodifacoum (35%). Applying historical limits of detection to allow comparison between these new data and previous assessments, we show that in the 25 years from 1992 to 2016 inclusive, the rate of detection of SGARs in polecats in Britain has increased by a factor of 1.7. The probability of SGAR detection was positively related to increasing values of δ15N, suggesting that polecats feeding at a higher trophic level were more likely to be exposed. Total concentrations of SGARs in polecats with detectable residues were higher in polecats collected in arable compared to pastoral habitats, and in the west compared to the east of Britain. The number of compounds detected and total concentrations of SGARs increased with polecat age. There was no evidence of regional or seasonal variation in the probability of detecting SGARs, suggesting that the current risk of exposure to SGARs does not vary seasonally and has increased (from that in the 1990s) throughout the polecat's range. We recommend quantification of current practices in rodenticide usage, particularly in the light of recent regulatory changes, to enable assessment and mitigation of the risks of secondary exposure to rodenticides in non-target wildlife.

Item Type:	Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.02.004
UKCEH and CEH Sections/Science Areas:	Pollution (Science Area 2017-)
ISSN:	0269-7491
Additional Keywords:	rodenticides, polecat, secondary exposure, bromadiolone, difenacoum, brodifacoum
NORA Subject Terms:	Ecology and Environment Zoology
Date made live:	19 Mar 2018 11:17 +0 (UTC)
URI:	https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/519519

Item Type:

Publication - Article

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.02.004

UKCEH and CEH Sections/Science Areas:

Pollution (Science Area 2017-)

ISSN:

0269-7491

Additional Keywords:

rodenticides, polecat, secondary exposure, bromadiolone, difenacoum, brodifacoum

NORA Subject Terms:

Ecology and Environment
Zoology