nerc.ac.uk

Nitrous oxide emissions from a peatbog after 13 years of experimental nitrogen deposition

Leeson, Sarah R.; Levy, Peter E.; van Dijk, Netty; Drewer, Julia; Robinson, Sophie; Jones, Matthew R.; Kentisbeer, John; Washbourne, Ian; Sutton, Mark A.; Sheppard, Lucy J.. 2017 Nitrous oxide emissions from a peatbog after 13 years of experimental nitrogen deposition. Biogeosciences, 14 (24). 5753-5764. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-5753-2017

Before downloading, please read NORA policies.
[img]
Preview
Text
N518816JA.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract/Summary

Nitrogen deposition was experimentally increased on a Scottish peatbog over a period of 13 years (2002–2015). Nitrogen was applied in three forms, NH3 gas, NH4Cl solution, and NaNO3 solution, at rates ranging from 8 (ambient) to 64 kg N ha−1 yr−1, and higher near the NH3 fumigation source. An automated system was used to apply the nitrogen, such that the deposition was realistic in terms of rates and high frequency of deposition events. We measured the response of nitrous oxide (N2O) flux to the increased nitrogen input. Prior expectations, based on the IPCC default emission factor, were that 1 % of the added nitrogen would be emitted as N2O. In the plots treated with NH4+ and NO3− solution, no response was seen, and there was a tendency for N2O fluxes to be reduced by additional nitrogen, though this was not significant. Areas subjected to high NH3 emitted more N2O than expected, up to 8.5 % of the added nitrogen. Differences in the response are related to the impact of the nitrogen treatments on the vegetation. In the NH4+ and NO3− treatments, all the additional nitrogen is effectively immobilised in the vegetation and top 10 cm of peat. In the NH3 treatment, much of the vegetation was killed off by high doses of NH3, and the nitrogen was presumably more available to denitrifying bacteria. The design of the wet and dry experimental treatments meant that they differed in statistical power, and we are less likely to detect an effect of the NH4+ and NO3− treatments, though they avoid issues of pseudo-replication.

Item Type: Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-5753-2017
CEH Sections/Science Areas: Atmospheric Chemistry and Effects (Science Area 2017-)
CEH Fellows
Unaffiliated
ISSN: 1726-4170
Additional Information. Not used in RCUK Gateway to Research.: Open Access paper - full text available via Official URL link.
NORA Subject Terms: Atmospheric Sciences
Date made live: 22 Dec 2017 10:15 +0 (UTC)
URI: http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/518816

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

Downloads for past 30 days

Downloads per month over past year

More statistics for this item...