Unpacking ecosystem service bundles: towards predictive mapping of synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services

Spake, Rebecca; Lasseur, Rémy; Crouzat, Emilie; Bullock, James M. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0529-4020; Lavorel, Sandra; Parks, Katherine E.; Schaafsma, Marije; Bennett, Elena M.; Maes, Joachim; Mulligan, Mark; Mouchet, Maud; Peterson, Garry D.; Schulp, Catharina J.E.; Thuiller, Wilfried; Turner, Monica G.; Verburg, Peter H.; Eigenbrod, Felix. 2017 Unpacking ecosystem service bundles: towards predictive mapping of synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 47. 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.08.004

Before downloading, please read NORA policies.

Preview

Text
N518509PP.pdf - Accepted Version
Download (1MB) | Preview

Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.08.004

Abstract/Summary

Multiple ecosystem services (ES) can respond similarly to social and ecological factors to form bundles. Identifying key social-ecological variables and understanding how they co-vary to produce these consistent sets of ES may ultimately allow the prediction and modelling of ES bundles, and thus, help us understand critical synergies and trade-offs across landscapes. Such an understanding is essential for informing better management of multi-functional landscapes and minimising costly trade-offs. However, the relative importance of different social and biophysical drivers of ES bundles in different types of social-ecological systems remains unclear. As such, a bottom-up understanding of the determinants of ES bundles is a critical research gap in ES and sustainability science. Here, we evaluate the current methods used in ES bundle science and synthesize these into four steps that capture the plurality of methods used to examine predictors of ES bundles. We then apply these four steps to a cross-study comparison (North and South French Alps) of relationships between social-ecological variables and ES bundles, as it is widely advocated that cross-study comparisons are necessary for achieving a general understanding of predictors of ES associations. We use the results of this case study to assess the strengths and limitations of current approaches for understanding distributions of ES bundles. We conclude that inconsistency of spatial scale remains the primary barrier for understanding and predicting ES bundles. We suggest a hypothesis-driven approach is required to predict relationships between ES, and we outline the research required for such an understanding to emerge.

Item Type:	Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.08.004
UKCEH and CEH Sections/Science Areas:	Biodiversity (Science Area 2017-)
ISSN:	0959-3780
Additional Keywords:	cross-study comparison, ecosystem services, French Alps, land use, social-ecological systems, trade-off, natural capital, biodiversity
NORA Subject Terms:	Ecology and Environment
Date made live:	27 Nov 2017 13:00 +0 (UTC)
URI:	https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/518509

Item Type:

Publication - Article

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.08.004

UKCEH and CEH Sections/Science Areas:

Biodiversity (Science Area 2017-)

ISSN:

0959-3780

Additional Keywords:

cross-study comparison, ecosystem services, French Alps, land use, social-ecological systems, trade-off, natural capital, biodiversity

NORA Subject Terms:

Ecology and Environment