nerc.ac.uk

The planform mobility of river channel confluences: Insights from analysis of remotely sensed imagery

Dixon, Simon J.; Sambrook Smith, Gregory H.; Best, James L.; Nicholas, Andrew P.; Bull, Jon M.; Vardy, Mark E.; Sarker, Maminul H.; Goodbred, Steven. 2018 The planform mobility of river channel confluences: Insights from analysis of remotely sensed imagery. Earth-Science Reviews, 176. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.09.009

Before downloading, please read NORA policies.
[img] Text (Open Access paper)
1-s2.0-S0012825216303464-main.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (4MB)
[img] Text
© 2017 Elsevier B.V. This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Earth Science Reviews. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was/will be published in Earth Science Reviews (doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.09.009)
Dixon_et_al_postprint_Earth_Science_Reviews_2017.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to NORA staff only

Download (4MB)

Abstract/Summary

River channel confluences are widely acknowledged as important geomorphological nodes that control the downstream routing of water and sediment, and which are locations for the preservation of thick fluvial deposits overlying a basal scour. Despite their importance, there has been little study of the stratigraphic characteristics of river junctions, or the role of confluence morphodynamics in influencing stratigraphic character and preservation potential. As a result, although it is known that confluences can migrate through time, models of confluence geomorphology and sedimentology are usually presented from the perspective that the confluence remains at a fixed location. This is problematic for a number of reasons, not least of which is the continuing debate over whether it is possible to discriminate between scour that has been generated by autocyclic processes (such as confluence scour) and that driven by allocyclic controls (such as sea-level change). This paper investigates the spatial mobility of river confluences by using the 40-year record of Landsat Imagery to elucidate the styles, rates of change and areal extent over which large river confluence scours may migrate. On the basis of these observations, a new classification of the types of confluence scour is proposed and applied to the Amazon and Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna (GBM) basins. This analysis demonstrates that the drivers of confluence mobility are broadly the same as those that drive channel change more generally. Thus in the GBM basin, a high sediment supply, large variability in monsoonal driven discharge and easily erodible bank materials result in a catchment where over 80% of large confluences are mobile over this 40-year window; conversely this figure is < 40% for the Amazon basin. These results highlight that: i) the potential areal extent of confluence scours is much greater than previously assumed, with the location of some confluences on the Jamuna (Brahmaputra) River migrating over a distance of 20 times the tributary channel width; ii) extensive migration in the confluence location is more common than currently assumed, and iii) confluence mobility is often tied to the lithological and hydrological characteristics of the drainage basins that determine sediment yield.

Item Type: Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.09.009
ISSN: 00128252
Date made live: 05 Oct 2017 08:27 +0 (UTC)
URI: http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/517987

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

Downloads for past 30 days

Downloads per month over past year

More statistics for this item...