Compensatory water effects link yearly global land CO2 sink changes to temperature

Jung, Martin; Reichstein, Markus; Schwalm, Christopher R.; Huntingford, Chris ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5941-7770; Sitch, Stephen; Ahlström, Anders; Arneth, Almut; Camps-Valls, Gustau; Ciais, Philippe; Friedlingstein, Pierre; Gans, Fabian; Ichii, Kazuhito; Jain, Atul K.; Kato, Etsushi; Papale, Dario; Poulter, Ben; Raduly, Botond; Rödenbeck, Christian; Tramontana, Gianluca; Viovy, Nicolas; Wang, Ying-Ping; Weber, Ulrich; Zaehle, Sönke; Zeng, Ning. 2017 Compensatory water effects link yearly global land CO2 sink changes to temperature. Nature, 541 (7638). 516-520. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature20780

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract/Summary

Large interannual variations in the measured growth rate of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) originate primarily from fluctuations in carbon uptake by land ecosystems. It remains uncertain, however, to what extent temperature and water availability control the carbon balance of land ecosystems across spatial and temporal scales. Here we use empirical models based on eddy covariance data and process-based models to investigate the effect of changes in temperature and water availability on gross primary productivity (GPP), terrestrial ecosystem respiration (TER) and net ecosystem exchange (NEE) at local and global scales. We find that water availability is the dominant driver of the local interannual variability in GPP and TER. To a lesser extent this is true also for NEE at the local scale, but when integrated globally, temporal NEE variability is mostly driven by temperature fluctuations. We suggest that this apparent paradox can be explained by two compensatory water effects. Temporal water-driven GPP and TER variations compensate locally, dampening water-driven NEE variability. Spatial water availability anomalies also compensate, leaving a dominant temperature signal in the year-to-year fluctuations of the land carbon sink. These findings help to reconcile seemingly contradictory reports regarding the importance of temperature and water in controlling the interannual variability of the terrestrial carbon balance. Our study indicates that spatial climate covariation drives the global carbon cycle response.

Item Type:	Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):	https://doi.org/10.1038/nature20780
UKCEH and CEH Sections/Science Areas:	Reynard
ISSN:	0028-0836
Additional Keywords:	carbon cycle, scientific data
NORA Subject Terms:	Ecology and Environment Atmospheric Sciences
Date made live:	26 Apr 2017 10:55 +0 (UTC)
URI:	https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/516929

Actions (login required)

View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...