Promoting natural regeneration for the restoration of Juniperus communis: a synthesis of knowledge and evidence for conservation practitioners

Broome, Alice; Long, Deborah; Ward, Lena K.; Park, Kirsty J.. 2017 Promoting natural regeneration for the restoration of Juniperus communis: a synthesis of knowledge and evidence for conservation practitioners. Applied Vegetation Science, 20 (3). 397-409. https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12303

Before downloading, please read NORA policies.

Preview

Text
N516803PP.pdf - Accepted Version
Download (708kB) | Preview

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12303

Abstract/Summary

Questions: Natural regeneration is central to plant conservation strategies. Worldwide, many Juniperus species are threatened due to their failure to regenerate. We focus on Juniperus communis in areas of NW Europe where it is declining and ask: what advice is available to land managers on natural regeneration methods, and when applied, how effective has this been? Methods: We synthesize knowledge on the efficacy of management interventions and conditions associated with J. communis regeneration. In field trials, we test interventions where knowledge is lacking. We assess regeneration of J. communis, creation of regeneration microsites and germination of sown seed in response to the interventions. Results: Although J. communis occurs in different habitats, there is consistency in site conditions important for regeneration (unshaded/open, short ground vegetation, disturbed/bare ground, low herbivore pressure). In calcareous grasslands, areas with regeneration are stony/bare or vegetation is short or sparse; in upland acid grasslands and dry heathlands regeneration locations are disturbed areas sometimes with a moss cover. Several interventions (grazing, scarification, turf stripping) can create regeneration conditions. The synthesis identified cattle grazing and ground scarification for further testing on upland acid grasslands. In the resulting field trials, regeneration was rare and recorded on only one cattle-grazed site. An exposed moss layer characterized regeneration microsites but there was insufficient evidence that either intervention increased regeneration microsite frequency. Few sown seeds germinated. Conclusions: Different interventions or intensities of these appear to be required depending on habitat type. Broadly, on calcareous grassland intense scarification or soil stripping is needed, while on dry heathlands light scarification is suitable. On upland acid grassland, cattle grazing and ground scarification do not reliably result in regeneration. Creation of favourable mossy regeneration microsites is unlikely following intervention, unless soil fertility is low. Land-use change, increased climate warming and pollution are pressures acting on J. communis and may cause habitat loss and altered site conditions (e.g. soil fertility), making it difficult to create regeneration microsites at all J. communis sites. Other constraints on regeneration may operate (e.g. seed predation and low seed viability) and managers should assess population and site potential before undertaking management.

Item Type:	Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):	https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12303
UKCEH and CEH Sections/Science Areas:	UKCEH Fellows
ISSN:	1402-2001
Additional Keywords:	grasslands, heathlands, juniper, management intervention, microsites, restoration, seed viability
NORA Subject Terms:	Ecology and Environment
Date made live:	05 Apr 2017 15:47 +0 (UTC)
URI:	https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/516803

Item Type:

Publication - Article

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12303

UKCEH and CEH Sections/Science Areas:

UKCEH Fellows

ISSN:

1402-2001

Additional Keywords:

grasslands, heathlands, juniper, management intervention, microsites, restoration, seed viability

NORA Subject Terms:

Ecology and Environment