Is bigger necessarily better for environmental research?

van der Wal, Rene; Fischer, Anke; Marquiss, Mick; Redpath, Steve; Wanless, Sarah ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2788-4606. 2009 Is bigger necessarily better for environmental research? Scientometrics, 78 (2). 317-322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-2017-0

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract/Summary

In restructuring environmental research organisations, smaller sites generally disappear and larger sites are created. These decisions are based on the economic principle, ‘economies of scale’, whereby the average cost of each unit produced falls as output increases. We show that this principle does not apply to the scientific performance of environmental research institutes, as productivity per scientist decreased with increasing size of a research site. The results are best explained by the principle ‘diseconomies of scale’, whereby powerful social factors limit the productivity of larger groupings. These findings should be considered when restructuring environmental science organisations to maximise their quality.

Item Type:	Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):	https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-2017-0
Programmes:	CEH Topics & Objectives 2009 - 2012 > Biodiversity
UKCEH and CEH Sections/Science Areas:	_ Biodiversity & Population Processes
ISSN:	0138-9130
NORA Subject Terms:	General Data and Information
Date made live:	25 Jan 2016 11:39 +0 (UTC)
URI:	https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/512691

Actions (login required)

View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...