An observational assessment of the influence of mesoscale and submesoscale heterogeneity on ocean biogeochemical reactions

Martin, Adrian ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1202-8612; Levy, Marina; van Gennip, Simon; Pardo, Silvia; Srokosz, Meric ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7347-7411; Allen, John; Painter, Stuart C.; Pidcock, Roz. 2015 An observational assessment of the influence of mesoscale and submesoscale heterogeneity on ocean biogeochemical reactions. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 29 (9). 1421-1438. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GB005129

Before downloading, please read NORA policies.

Preview	Text (Open Access paper) Martin_et_al-2015-Global_Biogeochemical_Cycles.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Download (3MB) | Preview
Preview	Text Accepted for publication in Global Biogeochemical Cycles. © 2015 American Geophysical Union. Further reproduction or electronic distribution is not permitted. gbc20322.pdf - Accepted Version Download (6MB) | Preview

Abstract/Summary

Numerous observations demonstrate that considerable spatial variability exists in components of the marine planktonic ecosystem at the mesoscale and submesoscale (100 km -1 km). The causes and consequences of physical processes at these scales (‘eddy advection’) influencing biogeochemistry have received much attention. Less studied, the non-linear nature of most ecological and biogeochemical interactions means that such spatial variability has consequences for regional estimates of processes including primary production and grazing, independent of the physical processes. This effect has been termed ‘eddy reactions’. Models remain our most powerful tools for extrapolating hypotheses for biogeochemistry to global scales and to permit future projections. The spatial resolution of most climate and global biogeochemical models means that processes at the mesoscale and submesoscale are poorly resolved. Modelling work has previously suggested that the neglected ‘eddy reactions’ may be almost as large as the mean field estimates in some cases. This study seeks to quantify the relative size of eddy and mean reactions observationally, using in situ and satellite data. For primary production, grazing and zooplankton mortality the eddy reactions are between 7% and 15% of the mean reactions. These should be regarded as preliminary estimates to encourage further observational estimates, and not taken as a justification for ignoring eddy reactions. Compared to modelling estimates, there are inconsistencies in the relative magnitude of eddy reactions and in correlations which are a major control on their magnitude. One possibility is that models exhibit much stronger spatial correlations than are found in reality, effectively amplifying the magnitude of eddy reactions.

Item Type:	Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):	https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GB005129
ISSN:	0886-6236
Additional Keywords:	mesoscale; submesoscale; biogeochemistry; eddy reaction; observations; modelling
NORA Subject Terms:	Marine Sciences
Date made live:	14 Aug 2015 12:56 +0 (UTC)
URI:	https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/511535

Actions (login required)

View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...