Quality Assessment of Surface Current Fields From TerraSAR-X and TanDEM-X Along-Track Interferometry and Doppler Centroid Analysis
Romeiser, Roland; Runge, Harmut; Suchandr, Steffan; Kahle, Ralph; Rossi, Cristian; Bell, Paul S. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4673-4822. 2014 Quality Assessment of Surface Current Fields From TerraSAR-X and TanDEM-X Along-Track Interferometry and Doppler Centroid Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 52 (5). 2759-2772. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2013.2265659
Before downloading, please read NORA policies.
|
Text
Bell_preprint_orkney4_reduced.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract/Summary
All existing examples of current measurements by spaceborne synthetic aperture radar (SAR) along-track (AT) interferometry (ATI) have suffered from short baselines and corresponding low sensitivities. Theoretically, the best data quality at X-band is expected at effective baselines on the order of 30 m, i.e., 30 times as long as the baselines of the divided-antenna modes of TerraSAR-X. In early 2012, we had a first opportunity to obtain data at near-optimum baselines from the TanDEM-X satellite formation. In this paper, we analyze two TanDEM-X interferograms acquired over the Pentland Firth (Scotland) with effective AT baselines of 25 and 40 m. For comparison, we consider a TerraSAR-X dual-receive-antenna (DRA)-mode interferogram with an effective baseline of 1.15 m, as well as velocity fields obtained by Doppler centroid analysis (DCA) of single-antenna data from the same three scenes. We show that currents derived from the TanDEM-X interferograms have a residual noise level of 0.1 m/s at an effective resolution of about 33 m $times$ 33 m, while DRA-mode data must be averaged over 1000 m $times$ 1000 m to reach the same level of accuracy. A comparison with reference currents from a 1-km resolution numerical tide computation system shows good agreement in all three cases. The DCA-based currents are found to be less accurate than the ATI-based ones but close to short-baseline ATI results in quality. We conclude that DCA is a considerable alternative to divided-antenna mode ATI, while our TanDEM-X results demonstrate the true potential of the ATI technique at near-optimum baselines.
Item Type: | Publication - Article |
---|---|
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): | https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2013.2265659 |
ISSN: | 0196-2892 |
Additional Keywords: | Synthetic aperture radar, Interferometry, Radar velocity measurement, Remote sensing |
Related URLs: | |
Date made live: | 16 Jul 2013 15:15 +0 (UTC) |
URI: | https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/502651 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |
Document Downloads
Downloads for past 30 days
Downloads per month over past year