Testing the protozoan hypothesis for Ediacaran fossils: a developmental analysis of Palaeopascichnus

Antcliffe, Jonathan B.; Gooday, Andrew J. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5661-7371; Brasier, Martin D.. 2011 Testing the protozoan hypothesis for Ediacaran fossils: a developmental analysis of Palaeopascichnus. Palaeontology, 54 (5). 1157-1175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4983.2011.01058.x

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

Abstract/Summary

The hypothesis that the Ediacara biota were giant protozoans is tested by considering the external morphology, internal organization, suggested fossil representatives and molecular phylogeny of the xenophyophores. From this analysis, we find no case to support a direct relationship. Rather, the xenophyophores are here regarded as a group of recently evolved Foraminifera and are hence unlikely to have a record from the Ediacaran Period. Further from the growth dynamics of Foraminifera, they are also unlikely to be related to the Palaeopascichnus organism. We also find significant distinctions in the growth dynamics of Palaeopascichnus and organisms usually referred to the Ediacara biota, such as Charnia and Dickinsonia. Developmental analysis of the Palaeopascichnus– central to the xenophyophore hypothesis – reveals unusual, protozoan features, including evidence for chaotic repair structures, for mergence of coeval forms, as well as complex bifurcations. These observations suggest that Palaeopascichnus is a body fossil of an unidentified protozoan but is unrepresentative of Ediacaran body construction, in general.

Item Type:	Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):	https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4983.2011.01058.x
ISSN:	00310239
Additional Keywords:	Palaeopascichnus; Ediacara biota; Protozoa; zenophyophores; development; evolution
Date made live:	23 Sep 2011 14:20 +0 (UTC)
URI:	https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/297517

Actions (login required)

View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...