Methods for targeting the restoration of grazing marsh and wet grassland communities at a national, regional and local scale
Mountford, J. O.; Roy, D. B. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5147-0331; Cooper, J. M.; Manchester, S. J.; Swetnam, R. D.; Warman, E. A.; Treweek, J. R.. 2006 Methods for targeting the restoration of grazing marsh and wet grassland communities at a national, regional and local scale. Journal for Nature Conservation, 14. 46-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2005.09.001
Full text not available from this repository.Abstract/Summary
Grazing marsh has been recognised as a key habitat in the UK, and included within the Biodiversity Action Plan structure. In the present research, the conservation value of extant English grazing marsh and its geographical variation were assessed, and a strategy for targeting restoration of grazing marsh developed. A two-stage approach was taken: Botanical species groups were targeted for restoration, and areas identified where this might be attempted. Those species commonest in the wet grassland biotope were defined and classified into species groups on the basis of (a) their established strategy, habitat requirements and life forms; and (b) their occurrence in described plant communities (National Vegetation Classification – NVC). Areas where restoration was practical were identified using co-occurrence mapping of species from both species groups and NVC communities, and the same method used to identify where marked declines in these groups had occurred since 1950. Using national databases (plants, birds, insects) and information on areas through which restoration schemes might be administered (e.g. the English Nature “Natural Areas”), six ecological attributes were derived enabling sites and areas to be ranked for restoration. Areas were also ranked by the total grazing marsh area they presently contained. Qualitative and quantitative rankings were compared. Ranked Natural Areas were assessed on the basis of the liability to flooding, altitude and land cover. Research identified two philosophies for targeting restoration, focusing either on high-quality areas where success is likely, or on degraded sites where relative gain in biodiversity may be greater.
Item Type: | Publication - Article |
---|---|
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2005.09.001 |
Programmes: | CEH Programmes pre-2009 publications > Biodiversity > SE01A Sustainable Monitoring and Management of Land Resources |
UKCEH and CEH Sections/Science Areas: | _ Ecological Processes & Modelling |
ISSN: | 1617-1381 |
Additional Keywords: | attribute, co-occurrence, distribution, natural area, rank, species group |
NORA Subject Terms: | Botany Agriculture and Soil Science Ecology and Environment |
Date made live: | 09 May 2008 08:21 +0 (UTC) |
URI: | https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/2897 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |
Document Downloads
Downloads for past 30 days
Downloads per month over past year