nerc.ac.uk

Geochemical modelling of fluoride concentration changes during Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) in the Chalk aquifer in Wessex, England

Gaus, I.; Shand, P.; Gale, I.N.; Williams, A.T.; Eastwood, J.C.. 2002 Geochemical modelling of fluoride concentration changes during Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) in the Chalk aquifer in Wessex, England. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 35 (2). 203-208. https://doi.org/10.1144/1470-9236/2001-52

Before downloading, please read NORA policies.
[img]
Preview
Text (Abstract)
Lytchett.pdf

Download (17kB) | Preview

Abstract/Summary

During ASR-cycle testing at a site in the confined Chalk near Lytchett Minster in Dorset, the high concentration of fluoride in the recovered water posed severe limitations on the success of the scheme. Based on physical modelling, the dual porosity character of the Chalk combined with high fluoride concentrations in the native water were identified as the key factors controlling the measured concentrations. However, mixing of water between the matrix pores and fractures was not sufficient to explain the fluoride concentration and it was concluded that there was an additional release of fluoride from aquifer interaction. This led to an additional increase in the fluoride concentration in the recovered water. In order to investigate this hypothesis, a geochemical model incorporating reactions between the injected water, the native groundwater and the aquifer minerals was developed. The geochemical model PHREEQC-2 was set up so that it was capable of modelling ASR-cycles (including radial flow and diffusive mixing as a consequence of dual porosity). The physical aspects of the model were calibrated using a 3-D dual porosity transport model (SWIFT). Different geochemical processes (e.g. limited mineral availability, reaction kinetics) causing fluoride concentrations above those expected from dual porosity mixing were investigated. Comparing the modelled results with the observations from the test site suggested that slow dissolution of fluoride minerals (fluorite) was likely to be responsible for the additional increase in fluoride concentration in the recovered water.

Item Type: Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1144/1470-9236/2001-52
Programmes: BGS Programmes > Groundwater Management
ISSN: 0481-2085
Additional Keywords: GroundwaterBGS, Groundwater, Groundwater resources, Groundwater quality, Groundwater protection, Groundwater and health
Related URLs:
Date made live: 23 Nov 2010 15:27 +0 (UTC)
URI: https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/12298

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

Downloads for past 30 days

Downloads per month over past year

More statistics for this item...