Judging quality in science. (Editorial)

Walton, David ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7103-4043. 2005 Judging quality in science. (Editorial). Antarctic Science, 17 (4). 481. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102005002993

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

Abstract/Summary

The joint inspection report by Australia, Peru and the United Kingdom, presented at the last ATCM in Stockholm, contained an unusual recommendation. On the basis of the science that they had seen at the research stations the inspection team had concluded that there was both very good science and very poor science being undertaken. They apparently believed that this pattern was probably true of the whole continent but needed a more expert examination. Their recommendation was that SCAR should undertake an in situ assessment of all scientific research in the Antarctic.

Item Type:	Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):	https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102005002993
Programmes:	BAS Programmes > Well Found Laboratory
ISSN:	0954-1020
NORA Subject Terms:	General > Science Policy
Date made live:	21 Jan 2008 14:25 +0 (UTC)
URI:	https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/2042

Actions (login required)

View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...