Judging quality in science. (Editorial)
Walton, David. 2005 Judging quality in science. (Editorial). Antarctic Science, 17 (4). 481. 10.1017/S0954102005002993Full text not available from this repository.
The joint inspection report by Australia, Peru and the United Kingdom, presented at the last ATCM in Stockholm, contained an unusual recommendation. On the basis of the science that they had seen at the research stations the inspection team had concluded that there was both very good science and very poor science being undertaken. They apparently believed that this pattern was probably true of the whole continent but needed a more expert examination. Their recommendation was that SCAR should undertake an in situ assessment of all scientific research in the Antarctic.
|Item Type:||Publication - Article|
|Digital Object Identifier (DOI):||10.1017/S0954102005002993|
|Programmes:||BAS Programmes > Well Found Laboratory|
|NORA Subject Terms:||General > Science Policy|
|Date made live:||21 Jan 2008 14:25|
Actions (login required)