Drought at the global scale for the 2nd part of the 20th Century (1963-2001)

Van Huijgevoort, Marjolein; Hazenberg, Pieter; van Lanen, Henny; Bertrand, Nathalie; Clark, Douglas ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1348-7922; Folwell, Sonja; Gomes, Sandra; Gosling, Simon N.; Hanasaki, Naota; Heinke, Jens; Koirala, Sujan; Stacke, Tobias; Voβ, Frank. 2011 Drought at the global scale for the 2nd part of the 20th Century (1963-2001). WATCH - European Commission, 40pp. (WATCH Technical Report No.42)

Before downloading, please read NORA policies.

Preview

Other WATCH+TECHNICAL+REPORT+NUMBER+42+DROUGHT+AT+THE+GLOBAL+SCALE+IN+THE+2ND+PART+OF+THE+20TH+CENTURY.PDF - Published Version Download (14MB)

Abstract/Summary

The large impacts of drought on society, economy and environment urge for a thorough investigation. A good knowledge of past drought events is important for both understanding of the processes causing drought, as well as to provide reliability assessments for drought projections for the future. Preferably, the investigation of historic drought events should rely on observations. Unfortunately, for a global scale these detailed observations are often not available. Therefore, the outcome of global hydrological models (GHMs) and o-line land surface models (LSMs) is used to assess droughts. In this study we have investigated to what extent simulated gridded time series from these large-scale models capture historic hydrological drought events. Results of ten dierent models, both GHMs and LSMs, made available by the WATCH project, were compared. All models are run on a global 0.5 grid for the period 1963-2000 with the same meteorological forcing data (WATCH forcing data). To identify hydrological drought events, the monthly aggregated total runo values were used. Dierent methods were developed to identify spatio-temporal drought characteristics. General drought characteristics for each grid cell, as for example the average drought duration, were compared. These characteristics show that when comparing absolute values the models give substantially dierent results, whereas relative values lead to more or less the same drought pattern. Next to the general drought characteristics, some documented major historical drought events (one for each continent) were selected and described in more detail. For each drought event, the simulated drought clusters (spatial events) and their characteristics are given for one month during the event. It can be concluded that most major drought events are captured by all models. However, the spatial extent of the drought events dier substantially between the models. In general the models show a fast reaction to rainfall and therefore also capture drought events caused by large rainfall anomalies. More research is still needed, since here we only looked at a few selected number of documented drought events spread over the globe. To assess more in detail if these large-scale models are able to capture drought, additional quantitative analyses are needed together with a more elaborated comparison against observed drought events

Item Type:	Publication - Report
Programmes:	CEH Topics & Objectives 2009 - 2012 > Water > WA Topic 3 - Science for Water Management > WA - 3.3 - Better represent hydrological and biogeochemical processes in Earth System Models
UKCEH and CEH Sections/Science Areas:	Reynard
Funders/Sponsors:	European Commission
NORA Subject Terms:	Hydrology
Date made live:	26 Jan 2012 14:11 +0 (UTC)
URI:	https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/16491

Actions (login required)

View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...